In every story, there are different characters, each with a unique view. One might think that their views would converge, but they rarely do. It is true that their viewpoints may intersect, often for extended periods of time, yet each remains unique in ways even the character can find hard to describe.
As a recent story developed, several outcomes emerge which could not be explained or understood from where I was sitting. In deconstructing the story and events, I have been reminded of the challenge of understanding results through a single lens. From any viewpoint except one, the outcome was a paradox. In my reflection, I see the story differently.
First, there were several flags waving, trying to get my attention, as the story developed and unfolded. I know I saw them along the way. I recall asking myself what they meant, satisfied by the answer which came from my initial superficial view. The result of multiple flags which were seen and understood through a single lens was the first element in the making a paradox.
Second, I was very comfortable in my character’s chair. I assume my line of sight was both direct but also, more importantly, complete. Ironically, I know and understand the other characters in the story. I have worn their shoes, walked in their steps. Even as the opportunities presented themselves to see the story from their chair, I comfortably remained in my own. My view, my understanding, my perspective was the whole story, until it was not.
Third, when a bad outcome emerged, I was surprised. I had no explanation. I could only see it as negative because I did not have the complete picture. The paradox was alive and in front of me. As my understanding of the bigger picture emerged, the paradox began to disappear.
In my reflection, I find myself considering psalmist’s view of Divinity.
“The God who struck down the Egyptian firstborn, His love never quits,” (Psalm 136.10)
I know I often miss the larger picture. In faith and trust, my quest to see and understand continues.
