Truth, on all sides, seems to be secondary. The distrust we have in anyone who holds a view that is different than our own has triggered an attitude that only “I” know what is truth. One, namely I, must see to believe. Another must prove the premise if it is to be true in my eyes. One must, above all, have a view that is compatible with my own if we are to have a conversation. Otherwise…the alternative is where we seem to be today.
The debate about truth is an old one. I can remember challenging the status quo in every decade with the rebuttal de jour starting with “but the truth says.” Truth was either twisted beyond recognition, taken out of context, or a truth myth (something that we have come to believe as truth however it a premise founded on tradition, status quo, or preference). For this generation as well as others, what is truth?
As a guide for my personal quest on the subject, I am reminded of the following.
Not all truths are equal. Truths can conflict and compete with other truths. As an example, does justice sit equal with mercy? When is a lie a deception versus a misdirection? Recognizing the prospect of multiple truths in a specific situation opens the possibility of a dialogue.
Process is always as or more important than outcomes. Truth is often used as a spear to win a battle and achieve a destination. Truth is a guide to the moment we are in, not the vehicle we take to get the result we want.
Hearing each other is difficult when one or both are hurting. Being committed to the relationships we have does not mean that we are not committed to the core values we have most dear. The tension that often arise in the moment is an opportunity to let compassion, caring, and community take precedence.
As I think of the god of compassion and mercy, I realize that “[S]He manufactures truth and justice; all his products are guaranteed to last.” (Psalm 111.07)
